Skip to main content

Evaluating Treatment Options in First-Line CLL:

Insights from a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Zanubrutinib and Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab

Intended for Physicians

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Topics:

06:36 Chapter 1
05:37 Chapter 2
04:37 Chapter 3
05:17 Chapter 4

Chapters
(Subsequent chapters are available upon completion of the prior chapter)

Currently Playing

Coming up next in 0:00

Watched

Placeholder

Chapter 1  |  6m 36s

Currently Playing

Coming up next in 01:05

Watched

Placeholder

Chapter 2  |  5m 37s

Currently Playing

Coming up next in 00:00

Watched

Placeholder

Chapter 3  |  4m 37s

Currently Playing

Coming up next in 00:00

Watched

Placeholder

Chapter 4  |  5m 17s

Program Objectives

Discuss the study design of the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analysis from Munir et al.

Summarize efficacy and safety outcomes between treatment-naïve CLL patients treated with zanubrutinib in the SEQUOIA trial and those treated with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab in the CLL14 trial.

Discuss the clinical implications and limitations of MAIC findings when comparing continuous vs fixed-duration treatment strategies in treatment-naïve CLL

Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine Tulane Cancer Center Member – Translational Oncology Research Program

OncLive | Targeted OncologyThis site is intended for US Healthcare Professionals only. Use of and access to this site are subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The information contained herein is provided for educational purposes only. All decisions regarding patient care must be made by a healthcare provider considering the unique characteristics of the patient. OncLive and Targeted Oncology are owned by MJH Life Sciences.